1 Introduction : Party System Change in the Neoliberal Era

نویسندگان

  • Hugo Chávez
  • Luiz Inácio
چکیده

A political earthquake struck Venezuela when Hugo Chávez was elected president in December 1998. Chávez, a former lieutenant colonel in the Venezuelan army, launched his political career in 1992 by leading a bloody military revolt against a democratic regime that had long been considered among the most stable in Latin America. The coup attempt failed, landing Chávez in prison, but it catapulted the former paratrooper instructor into the public imagination as a symbol of rebellion against the political establishment and its mismanagement of the country’s oil wealth. Following a presidential pardon, Chávez founded a new political movement and launched a populist campaign for the presidency in frontal opposition to traditional parties and the free-market reforms they had supported for most of the past decade. Although Venezuela boasted one of the strongest and most highly institutionalized party systems in Latin America (Coppedge 1994; Mainwaring and Scully 1995: 17), the two dominant parties ultimately withdrew their own presidential candidates and threw their support to a less threatening independent figure in a desperate gambit to defeat Chávez’s “outsider” campaign. Nevertheless, Chávez won a landslide victory that not only signaled the eclipse of traditional parties, but a collapse of the collusive, patronage-ridden political order they had anchored since the founding of the democratic regime forty years before. Within a year, Chávez had bypassed congress and convoked a series of popular referendums to elect a constituent assembly, rewrite and ratify a new constitution, and refound regime institutions. For Venezuela, a new political era had dawned. Several years later, neighboring Brazil also elected a new leftist president, former union leader Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva of theWorkers’ Party (PT). Like Chávez, Lula had a track record of opposition to the “neoliberal” market reforms that swept across Latin America in the waning decades of the 20th century, although he had moderated his stance considerably by the time he

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

-1- Party Systems and Electoral Volatility during Latin America's Transition to Economic Liberalism

This paper provides an article-length overview of the first half of a book manuscript that is forthcoming from Cambridge University Press. It is not intended to be a stand-alone piece; there are some loose ends in the paper that are addressed elsewhere in the larger manuscript. Nevertheless, the paper sketches out the core arguments from the first half of the book about party system transformat...

متن کامل

What ontological assumptions underpin David Cameron’s ‘modernisation’ of Conservative Party welfare policy?

This work seeks to explicate the ontological assumptions that underpin the development of Conservative Party welfare policy from 2005 to 2010. The assumptions will be discussed in four themes: structure/agency, social change, human nature and gender. The work shall begin by discussing the ontological assumptions of neoliberalism through the work of Hayek, Friedman, Mead and Murray, using exampl...

متن کامل

Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality

The world was different when the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion was released 30 years ago. Concerns over the environment and what we now call the ‘social determinants of health’ were prominent in 1986. But the acceleration of ecological crises and economic inequalities since then, in a more complex and multi-polar world, pose dramatically new challenges for those committed to the original ...

متن کامل

Obstacles to the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey (2002 –present) "The vague political nature, the organized structure of the party, and the authoritarian leadership"

Abstract The process of democratization of Turkey over more than a century has been accompanied by various barriers, such as military intervention, inefficient and passive opposition, undemocratic performance and sponsor of the religious-political tariqa, ethnic and religious rifts, authoritarian government leaders, political parties’ poor and sometimes biased performance, contradictory intern...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014